Navigating the health and social system a challenging part of caregiving

By Amélie Quesnel-Vallée and Miles Taylor

Governments need to start investing in care navigators to ensure equitable access to publicly funded services and supports

A version of this commentary appeared in the Toronto Star, Huffington Post and Windsor Star

Navigating the health and social system a challenging part of caregivingIt’s a fact: the Canadian population is aging. For the first time in history, Canadians 65 years and over outnumber those 14 years and under. To face this major demographic change head on, we need to adapt.

In particular, to meet the preferences of the great majority of Canadians who want to age in the community, we will have to rethink how we support the caregivers that make this possible.

But how do we provide better support to caregivers?

In a recent journal article, my colleague and I argue we must begin by recognizing that the fragmentation of the health and social systems itself is generating a substantial amount of burden for caregivers. Yet this “structural burden” of caregiving often goes unrecognized by the system, not to mention caregivers themselves.

Part of the reason is that research up until now has mainly defined caregiving burden in terms of the amount of time and stress it takes to physically provide care to another person — helping with daily tasks and personal hygiene for instance.

But what about the time spent negotiating health care systems, scheduling and getting to and from treatments, often in the middle of the day, figuring out which services will be covered and under which circumstances?

That part of the caregiving burden isn’t well-articulated, measured or understood.  And it certainly isn’t often appreciated.

As academics in the fields of aging and health services research, we, ourselves, really only fully came to realize what this part of caregiving means to the caregiver when we began more actively providing care for our aging parents. We thought we knew what we were getting ourselves into. We anticipated that providing direct care would be challenging and we knew what help to seek and where. What we were not prepared for was how much time and stress we would spend trying to understand, negotiate and manage medical and social care for our loved ones.

What was particularly surprising was that we both encountered this problem via two very different health systems: one in Quebec and one in Florida.  Of course, financial worries for health provision were much less prevalent in Quebec than in Florida, but they were not altogether absent, as the home and long-term care sector is very much privately financed in Quebec (and throughout the rest of Canada).

Ultimately, we both struggled in remarkably similar ways with negotiating and managing discontinuous and fragmented care and services.

And despite the difficulties we encountered, we recognized that our social position, in terms of education, income and even profession, gave us more social currency and health care literacy than most — and likely helped us gain information and access services. This realisation left us concerned for the potential that this structural burden has for exacerbating social inequalities among patients and caregivers.

The market has already figured out this opportunity.  Private case manager services exist in both countries to assist caregivers navigating the system. This indicates that there is a real need out there, and that shortcomings in the public sector are being fulfilled by the private sector, at the cost of equitable access.

So what can be done?

First, the “structural burden” of caregiving has to be included in health policy research and health reform.  Right now, for example, most surveys on caregiving only question how much time caregivers take feeding or bathing their care recipient or providing other daily tasks such as taking out the trash.

We should increasingly ask how much time and stress is expended by caregivers negotiating with medical and social care systems, trying to figure out which services are available and when.  The answer might surprise many health policy analysts — but it won’t surprise caregivers.

With these numbers in hand, we could advocate for support from governments to fund public navigator services. These services already exist in certain areas of the system, such as in cancer and palliative care, but they are not widespread and readily available to individuals without such clear diagnoses and prognoses.  In our experience, it would have made a world of difference to be able to rely on such support.

It’s also important that everyone understand the time and stress involved in managing care and negotiating services is also caregiving. It can be a substantial burden that should be acknowledged and recognized. Because if we don’t care for the caregivers, who will?

 

Amélie Quesnel-Vallée is an expert advisor with EvidenceNetwork.ca, the Canada Research Chair on Policies and Health Inequalities and Director of the Observatory on Health and Social Services Reforms at McGill University.

Miles Taylor is Associate Professor of Sociology and Faculty Associate at the Pepper Institute on Aging and Public Policy at Florida State University and a Fellow of the Gerontological Society of America.

This entry was posted in Commentaries, Aging Population & Its Potential Impact, Commentaries, Health is More than Healthcare and tagged , , , , , , , , .

Comments are closed.

« Back to Commentaries

License to Republish: Our commentaries, Infographics and videos are provided under the terms of a CreativeCommons Attribution No-Derivatives license. This license allows for free redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author and EvidenceNetwork.ca
EvidenceNetwork.ca supports the use of evidence when reporting on health and health policy in the mainstream media. Specific points of view represented here are the author’s and not those of EvidenceNetwork.ca. Let us know how we’re doing: evidencenetwork@gmail.com