The United States is stepping up its efforts: 1,500 U.S. military armored vehicles will be equipped with a new anti-drone shield by 2027.

By Dr. Luke Toones

The United States Army is taking decisive action against emerging battlefield threats with an ambitious plan to upgrade its armored fleet. By 2027, approximately 1,500 American military vehicles will receive specialized anti-drone protection systems, representing a major shift in modern combat strategy. This initiative comes in direct response to lessons learned from recent conflicts where drones have dramatically changed warfare dynamics.

Revolutionary anti-drone shields transforming US military capabilities

The Pentagon has allocated approximately $100 million (โ‚ฌ92 million) to equip 1,280 armored vehicles with advanced Top Attack Protection (TAP) systems by late 2027. This significant investment addresses a critical vulnerability that has become painfully apparent in contemporary warfare scenarios. Modern battlefield dynamics have evolved rapidly with the proliferation of affordable drone technology, creating new threats to conventional armored forces.

These protective systems, inspired by the makeshift “cope cages” first observed on Russian tanks in 2021, have evolved into sophisticated defensive solutions. The TAP systems feature specially designed metal structures mounted above vehicle turrets to intercept, deflect, or prematurely detonate incoming aerial munitions before they can strike vulnerable top surfaces. American military strategists have prioritized this technology after analyzing combat data from various conflict zones where armored vehicles faced devastating aerial attacks.

The US Department of Defense relies on multiple technological partners for military advancement, similar to how NASA and the Department of Defense depend on SpaceX for various space-related capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures American forces maintain technological superiority across multiple domains.

Implementation of these protective systems will occur in phases, with different vehicles receiving customized configurations based on their specific operational requirements. The comprehensive protection strategy includes:

  • Thermal signature management paint to reduce detection
  • Advanced laser warning receivers to alert crews of targeting
  • Reactive armor modules for specific platforms
  • Customized TAP structures designed for each vehicle type

Lessons from Ukraine shaping future armored warfare doctrine

The urgency behind this protective initiative stems directly from combat observations in Ukraine, where armored vehicles from both sides have suffered catastrophic losses to low-cost drone attacks. Of the 31 M1 Abrams tanks initially supplied to Ukrainian forces, 22 were reportedly destroyed or damaged, with most neutralized by attacks from above using FPV (First Person View) drones carrying explosive payloads.

Following these losses, the remaining tanks were temporarily withdrawn and later returned to service with additional protective measures. This real-world combat experience has fundamentally altered American military thinking regarding armored vehicle vulnerabilities and prompted this large-scale upgrade program. The vertical attack vector represents a paradigm shift that traditional armor designs simply weren’t conceived to counter.

Military technology failures can lead to significant consequences, as seen when Starship 36 by SpaceX exploded during testing, though fortunately without casualties. Similarly, unprotected armored vehicles face potentially catastrophic outcomes when confronted with modern drone threats.

The implementation timeline for these protective measures follows a carefully structured schedule:

Development Phase Scheduled Timeline
Contract Initiation April 2026
Prototype Testing Summer 2026
Production Commencement Spring 2027
Initial Deliveries November 2027
Fleet-wide Implementation 2028-2029

Comprehensive vehicle protection system beyond simple drone shields

The American anti-drone initiative extends beyond simple metal cages. The Vehicle Protection System (VPS) program integrates multiple defensive technologies to create layered protection for armored assets. This comprehensive approach acknowledges that modern threats come from multiple vectors and require multifaceted countermeasures.

Different vehicle platformsโ€”including the M1 Abrams tanks, Bradley Fighting Vehicles, and Stryker combat vehiclesโ€”will receive customized protection packages tailored to their specific operational profiles. Factors such as weight limitations, hatch accessibility, and deployment requirements dictate distinct design variations across the vehicle fleet. The TAP systems represent just one component of a broader protective strategy.

While the United States advances its armored vehicle protection capabilities, other nations are also making significant technological strides. For instance, China’s Tianwen-2 mission aims to return asteroid samples to Earth, demonstrating how technological competition extends beyond traditional military domains into space exploration.

The military’s enhanced vehicle protection approach includes:

  1. Physical protective structures to intercept incoming threats
  2. Signature reduction technologies to avoid detection
  3. Early warning systems to alert crews of potential attacks
  4. Active countermeasure systems for certain platforms
  5. Tactical doctrine adjustments to minimize vulnerability

Reshaping future combat vehicle design philosophy

The anti-drone shield program signals a fundamental shift in armored vehicle design philosophy. Future combat vehicles, including the developmental M1E3 Abrams variant, will incorporate top-attack protection as a standard feature rather than an afterthought or field modification. This evolutionary approach acknowledges the permanent change in battlefield dynamics brought about by widespread drone adoption.

Military leadership has publicly acknowledged that no current tank design provides adequate protection against aerial threats without supplemental systems. This candid assessment has driven the systematic integration of TAP systems across all combat platforms. The vulnerability of even the most sophisticated armored vehicles to relatively inexpensive drone weapons has forced a radical rethinking of protection priorities.

The aerial threat dimension has effectively ended the era where ground vehicles could rely primarily on frontal armor protection. Future designs must consider the three-dimensional battlefield environment where attacks can come from any direction, with particular emphasis on overhead vulnerabilities previously considered secondary concerns.

As drone technology continues to evolve rapidly, these protective measures represent just the first step in an ongoing adaptation process. The arms race between offensive drone capabilities and defensive countermeasures will likely accelerate, requiring continuous innovation to maintain effective protection for ground forces in tomorrow’s conflicts.

Dr. Luke Toones
About the author
Dr. Luke Toones
Dr. Luke Toones is an Assistant Professor of Public Health Policy at the University of Saskatchewan and a contributor to EvidenceNetwork.ca. He holds a Ph.D. in Community Health from the University of Toronto. Dr. Toonesโ€™s research focuses on evidence-informed policymaking, health equity, and translating research into practical solutions for communities and decision-makers.
Published in